Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ames!haven!mimsy!mojo!cyliao From: cyliao@eng.umd.edu (Chun-Yao Liao) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple Subject: Re: Apple C+ Message-ID: <1989Dec16.152608.7109@eng.umd.edu> Date: 16 Dec 89 15:26:08 GMT References: <37312@apple.Apple.COM> Sender: news@eng.umd.edu (The News System) Reply-To: cyliao@eng.umd.edu (Chun-Yao Liao) Organization: University of Maryland, College Park Lines: 22 Actually, I'd like to pay for an upgrade from older //c to //c+ as long as the price wouldn't be too high. It is even more meaningful to us who still own the original //c. I want to get a UniDisk 3.5 but it is so much expensive then Apple Disk 3.5, and is slower.. Beside that, I can only use the VERY EXPENSIVE UniDISK 3.5 which I can't afford... does this make sense? I mean people who has money to buy more expensive computers has option to buy cheaper peripherals while we the poor people who can afford to buy a small computer only, has no option but to buy expensive peripherals... does this make sense? does it? I understand that to upgrade from // to //c+ is not easy since things are quite different from each other, and thats the reason that I said "I'd like to PAY" for an upgrade. -- _______________________________________________________________________________ cyliao@wam.umd.edu (Chun-Yao Liao) | I want Rocket Chip 10 MHz, Z-Ram Ultra II, UniDisk 3.5 | Now, I want my own NeXT, 64 Mb RAM, 660 Mb SCSI, NeXT laser |