Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!apple!mattd From: mattd@Apple.COM (Matt Deatherage) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple Subject: Re: Apple C+ Message-ID: <37323@apple.Apple.COM> Date: 16 Dec 89 18:10:50 GMT References: <37312@apple.Apple.COM> <1989Dec16.152608.7109@eng.umd.edu> Organization: Apple Computer Inc, Cupertino, CA Lines: 28 In article <1989Dec16.152608.7109@eng.umd.edu> cyliao@eng.umd.edu (Chun-Yao Liao) writes: >It is even more meaningful to us who still own the original //c. I want to >get a UniDisk 3.5 but it is so much expensive then Apple Disk 3.5, and is >slower.. Beside that, I can only use the VERY EXPENSIVE UniDISK 3.5 which >I can't afford... does this make sense? I mean people who has money to buy >more expensive computers has option to buy cheaper peripherals while we the >poor people who can afford to buy a small computer only, has no option but >to buy expensive peripherals... does this make sense? does it? > >cyliao@wam.umd.edu (Chun-Yao Liao) | Uh...excuse me, but the last time I checked the price list, the Apple 3.5 Drive and the UniDisk 3.5 cost exactly the same. Perhaps this has changed without my knowledge; I'll look again next week. Even if it has, you can probably find a GS owner somewhere with a UniDisk who will gladly trade you for an Apple 3.5 Drive if you'd care to purchase the latter. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Matt Deatherage, Apple Computer, Inc. | "The opinions expressed in this tome Send PERSONAL mail ONLY (please) to: | should not be construed to imply that Amer. Online: Matt DTS | Apple Computer, Inc., or any of its ThisNet: mattd@apple.com | subsidiaries, in whole or in part, ThatNet: (stuff)!ames!apple!mattd | have any opinion on any subject." Other mail by request only, please. | "So there." -----------------------------------------------------------------------------