Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!mcgill-vision!bloom-beacon!snorkelwacker!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!sun!imagen!atari!danscott
From: danscott@atari.UUCP (Dan Scott)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: FLAMES and SUPPORT IN THE MINUS REALM
Message-ID: <1901@atari.UUCP>
Date: 18 Dec 89 23:55:38 GMT
References: <24958@cup.portal.com>
Organization: Atari Corp., Sunnyvale CA.
Lines: 15

in article <24958@cup.portal.com>, Bob_BobR_Retelle@cup.portal.com says:
> 
> Just one question in this discussion...
>  
> If Atari has such a low opinion of the "end users" who buy their machines,
> and can assume that 90% of them only want to run programs, not write them,
> why has Atari traditionally supplied a   *programming language*   with the
> computers..?
>  
> In fact, my ST came with  *two*  programming languages...


You call LOGO and ST BASIC *REAL* programming languages?

Dan