Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!snorkelwacker!think!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!ucsd!nprdc!malloy From: malloy@nprdc.arpa (Sean Malloy) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: Xerox sues Apple!!! Message-ID: <5136@skinner.nprdc.arpa> Date: 19 Dec 89 16:00:27 GMT References: <4540@ur-cc.UUCP> <111700188@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu> Reply-To: malloy@nprdc.arpa (Sean Malloy) Organization: Navy Personnel R&D Center, San Diego Lines: 27 In article <111700188@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu> krb20699@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu writes: >>One reason Xerox is sueing Apple now may be that Xerox was (fairly) recently >>awarded patents on the Star operating environment. Patent infringements are >>usually more easily proven than copyright ones. > > Wouldn't a recent patent be a bit worthless in court, considering when >Apple created the Mac, it wan't infringing in a patent? Why would the Mac >interface be damaging Xerox _only_ after they get a patent? I can see Apple >loosing copyright rights (I'm no lawyer) but $150 million? "Just a thought." Are you aware of how _long_ it can take to get a patent issued? Have you ever noticed little inscriptions on products that say "Patent Pending"? Xerox recently received the patent; nothing I've seen on the net has yet provided _any_ information about when the patent application was _filed_. If Apple brought out the Mac and Lisa _before_ the patent was filed, Xerox can't sue for patent infringement. If the Mac and Lisa came out _after_ the patent application was filed they are wide open for a suit, and since Apple has admitted that they took inspiration from the Xerox Star interface, they've shot themselves in the foot going into a patent infringement suit. Sean Malloy | ". . . They always have an air Navy Personnel Research & Development Center | of cheap melodrama about them." San Diego, CA 92152-6800 | "You will find, my dear, that malloy@nprdc.navy.mil | _true_ melodrama _never_ comes | cheap."