Xref: utzoo comp.sys.amiga:46202 comp.sys.ibm.pc:40476 comp.sys.mac:44854
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!uwvax!umn-d-ub!umn-cs!nis!sialis!rjg
From: rjg@sialis.mn.org (Robert J. Granvin)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga,comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Xerox sues Apple!!!
Message-ID: <2116@sialis.mn.org>
Date: 20 Dec 89 05:24:30 GMT
References: <6767@tank.uchicago.edu> <1989Dec17.112127.27333@me.toronto.edu> <14960@boulder.Colorado.EDU> <7777@cbnewsm.ATT.COM> <3450@husc6.harvard.edu>
Reply-To: rjg@sialis.mn.org (Robert J. Granvin)
Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga
Organization: Dr. Ho Laboratory and Day Care Center
Lines: 27

In article <3450@husc6.harvard.edu> fry@brauer.harvard.edu (Zippy) writes:
>In article <7777@cbnewsm.ATT.COM> wg@cbnewsm.ATT.COM (Bill Gieske) writes:
>>In article <14960@boulder.Colorado.EDU>, kuo@boulder.Colorado.EDU (KUO ANDY Y) writes:
>>>   If *some* people would not be so close minded...
>>
>>I have YET to meet an open-minded Apple owner.  Every one I've met seems 
>>hell-bent on convincing me their piece of shit doesn't stink.  Great things
>>need no defense - they stand on their own merits.
>
>Then what are you defending and why?

This is a GREAT argument (the Bill Argument... :-)  No matter what,
you lose.

If you don't argue the merits of whatever you're defending, then you
have to accept the argument that it's junk.

If you do defend it, however, it must be junk because it can't stand
on it's own merits.

Thank you for a particularly amusing concept.

-- 
________Robert J. Granvin________        INTERNET: rjg@sialis.mn.org
____National Computer Systems____          BITNET: rjg%sialis.mn.org@nic.mr.net
__National Information Services__            UUCP: ...amdahl!bungia!sialis!rjg
                "Go ahead... be naughty.  Save Santa the trip."