Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!gdavis
From: gdavis@primate.wisc.edu (Gary Davis)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: What do I want to see in the Apple of the 90's?
Message-ID: <1299@uakari.primate.wisc.edu>
Date: 15 Dec 89 15:37:38 GMT
References: <3317@hub.UUCP>
Sender: news@primate.wisc.edu
Reply-To: gdavis@primate.wisc.edu
Lines: 11

From article <3317@hub.UUCP>, by 6600pete@hub.UUCP:
> If you can make a persuasive case that somehow Pascal calling sequence is
> inferior to C calling sequence, I'm with you. As I understand it, C's
> Pete Gontier   | InterNet: 6600pete@ucsbuxa.ucsb.edu, BitNet: 6600pete@ucsbuxa

Bill Gates argues the opposite: that the Pascal calling convention
is more efficient than that of C and that's why they used the
Pascal convention in Windows (OS/2 as well??). I don't know the
reasoning behind this.

Gary Davis