Xref: utzoo comp.sys.mac:44366 comp.sys.next:4371 Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!ut-emx.UUCP!chari From: chari@ut-emx.UUCP (Christohpher M. Whatlyey) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.next Subject: Re: What do I want to see in the Apple of the 90's? Message-ID: <22438@ut-emx.UUCP> Date: 16 Dec 89 00:05:05 GMT References: <1636@intercon.com> Sender: news@ut-emx.UUCP Lines: 40 > No, actually, I'm not kidding. The NeXT's gray scale buttons and so on are > very cute, but they've made a lot of the operations abstract to the point > of obscurity. Besides, an application bar and a directory browser are no > match for the Finder. This is not to say that the NeXT doesn't have some > nifty innovations, but as a whole it's a less cohesive interface. Also, > I get the feeling that a lot of people who are claiming that the NeXT, or > MOTIF, or whatever are more "advanced" than the Mac actually mean that they > look newer. Just because something is familar, though, doesn't mean it's > obsolete. Well. From "real-world" experience, I can tell you that people who find the Macintosh puzzling get along rather well on the NeXT. It is just so simple to use. Use effectively, is what I meant to say. I'd love to take two people who are as technology ignorant as say my father or my roomate and sit them both down in front of a Mac II and a NeXT. I can tell you that whoever is on the NeXT will get their document out faster. Really, my roomate is one of the most ignorant people you could find when it comes to computers and he uses WriteNow, PrintManager, Webster Librarian and Quotations quite effectively. He never asks questions and he never complains. He cannot use a Mac and Word. Period! > > Last time I looked, my university price for a NeXT was much cheaper than > > a comparable MacIIci. And that wasn't counting all of the free software, > > DSP chip, or R/W/optical disk. > > Well, last time I tried a NeXT, its performance was closer to a II or IIx > than to a IIci. Also, are you counting university prices on both sides? What on earth are you talking about? The only time I find my NeXT slow is when I happen to be taking in stuff at 19.2k over the modem and unbatching news onto an optical when I'm trying to do something else. Text scrolling is faster than IIcis I have used for sure. And disk access. Don't even try to argue that one. Sorry to be fussy but, I'm letting off a little exam tension. Chris chari@pelican.ma.utexas.edu \ chari@nueces.cactus.org --NeXT Mail