Xref: utzoo comp.sys.mac:44474 comp.sys.next:4421 Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!wuarchive!uwm.edu!dogie.macc.wisc.edu!uwvax!oka.cs.wisc.edu!jcargill From: jcargill@oka.cs.wisc.edu (Jon Cargille) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.next Subject: Re: What do I want to see in the Apple of the 90's? Message-ID: <9400@spool.cs.wisc.edu> Date: 17 Dec 89 17:26:22 GMT References: <22438@ut-emx.UUCP> <3333@hub.UUCP> <1989Dec17.064813.16650@nueces.cactus.org> <37341@apple.Apple.COM> Sender: news@spool.cs.wisc.edu Reply-To: jcargill@oka.cs.wisc.edu (Jon Cargille) Followup-To: alt.religion.computers Organization: U of Wisconsin CS Dept Lines: 50 In article <37341@apple.Apple.COM> rewing@Apple.COM (Richard Ewing) writes: > > We all know that >the NeXT machine is 4-bit mono, not grayscale Gee, I'm glad we all know that...... Flame on: Mono is black&white which implies 1-bit. "4-bit mono" is nonsense. NeXT is 2-bit GREYSCALE which implies 4 (2^2) shades of grey. Flame off. In article <37341@apple.Apple.COM> rewing@Apple.COM (Richard Ewing) writes: >In article <1989Dec17.064813.16650@nueces.cactus.org> chari@nueces.cactus.org (Chris Whatley) writes: >> >>I wasn't talking about an optical. I was talkign about a *330* meg >>SCSI and anyway, the optical is (perceptibly) faster than most Mac >>drives that cost $1500.00 and give you 256 megs of storage on a $50.00 >>removable disk. Oops. I guess there aren't any. Oh well. > >My counterpart who works for NeXT in Atlanta will even say that the >optical drive is slow; he has to me. Anyone who says 90 ms seek time isn't slow is lying or brain-dead. >And if you think you can't get a removable manegto-optical drive >for the Mac, then you haven't been shopping lately. Jeez....read what he wrote!! He wasn't saying that you can't buy the same technology for a Mac. Of course you can. But people who buy NeXTs are getting one a LOT cheaper. Last prices I saw for Mac drives were in the $5-6K range. Of course, those are double sided drives (600 M), so you could probably get a single-sided (300M) drive like the NeXT's for half that. But they're definitely not cheap. You could buy a good chunk of a NeXT for what the drive will cost you... >Again, i say, MAKE SURE YOU KNOW WHAT YOU'RE SAYING HERE!!! Some >of these comments made here are downright wrong! And silly! I'd like to send that one RIGHT BACK AT YOU, BUCKO! :) Sorry for joining in on this one, folks. I don't see that we're accomplishing anything here. How about we redirect this discussion to alt.religion.computers? See Followups line. Jon jcargill@cs.wisc.edu