Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!apple!apple.com!casseres
From: casseres@apple.com (David Casseres)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Fwd: Xerox - Apple Computer Suit -2-
Message-ID: <5827@internal.Apple.COM>
Date: 18 Dec 89 17:15:28 GMT
Sender: usenet@Apple.COM
Organization: Apple Computer, Inc.
Lines: 14
References:<wZW33PG00Uke80VIdG@andrew.cmu.edu> <cZW4IjO00Uh7429HEy@andrew.cmu.edu> <1989Dec17.184851.7635@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu> <986@biar.UUCP>

In article <986@biar.UUCP> trebor@biar.UUCP (Robert J Woodhead) writes:
> nobody denies
> that a large part of the basics of the windowing interface in general,
> and the Mac implementation in particular, were developed and tested at
> Xerox PARC.

This one is a bit too outrageous to let pass.  Absolutely _no_ part of the 
Mac implementation was developed and tested at PARC.  Furthermore, the 
basic concept of multiple windows came from SRI, as did the mouse.  Should 
SRI be suing Xerox?

David Casseres

Exclaimer:  Hey!