Xref: utzoo comp.sys.ibm.pc:40226 comp.sys.mac:44587 comp.sys.amiga:46017
Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!mailrus!iuvax!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!tank!gft_robert@gsbacd.uchicago.edu
From: gft_robert@gsbacd.uchicago.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Xerox sues Apple!!!
Message-ID: <6786@tank.uchicago.edu>
Date: 18 Dec 89 22:32:59 GMT
Sender: news@tank.uchicago.edu
Organization: University of Chicago Graduate School of Business
Lines: 27

In article <1439@lakesys.lakesys.com>, mark@lakesys.lakesys.com (Mark Storin) writes...
 
>In article <9105@asylum.SF.CA.US> langz@asylum.UUCP (Lang Zerner) writes:
>>In article <9097@asylum.SF.CA.US> sharon@asylum.UUCP (Sharon Fisher) writes:
>>>In article <6767@tank.uchicago.edu> gft_robert@gsbacd.uchicago.mdu writes:
>>>>
[next, sun, etc. liscensing from Xerox]
 
But if Apple has to liscense, then it's liscense to to MicroSoft is invalid,
and Windows is also in trouble, no?

>What I'd like to see is Xerox win just to put Apple in their place and then
>turn around and grant licences for the technology at some rediculously low
>price (to everyone but Apple that is :-).

I don't think you can charge different liscensing fees purely for spite.  BTW,
I never knew that so many Macintosh users were so spiteful.  I guess you learn
something new every day.

Robert


============================================================================
= gft_robert@gsbacd.uchicago.edu * generic disclaimer: * "It's more fun to =
=            		         * all my opinions are *  compute"         =
=                                * mine                *  -Kraftwerk       =
============================================================================