Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!think!mintaka!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!sumax!nwnexus!intek01!mark
From: mark@intek01.UUCP (Mark McWiggins)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Think C++ (was 32K limit: workaround?)
Message-ID: <261@intek01.UUCP>
Date: 19 Dec 89 22:59:18 GMT
Organization: Integration Technologies Inc. (Intek), Bellevue WA
Lines: 17

Anyway ... what I'd really like is a Think C++, with no 32K limit and true
C++ compatibility (at least thru version 1.2; I could live without multiple
inheritance if I had to.)  The current object support in Think C 4.0 is
not encouraging in this respect, being close enough to look like C++, but
different enough to be confusing/incompatible.

I seem to recall this being hashed thru in this group a few months back,
but (a) I wasn't paying very close attention at the time and (b) perhaps
the Think-ers have something new to report?  I'd really like to use a
Think compiler, but the current one won't work for me without more trouble
than I can afford.

-- 
Mark McWiggins			Integration Technologies, Inc. (Intek)
+1 206 455 9935			DISCLAIMER:  I could be wrong ...
1400 112th Ave SE #202		Bellevue WA  98004
uunet!intek01!mark		Ask me about C++!