Xref: utzoo comp.sys.next:4494 comp.sys.mac:44875 comp.lang.smalltalk:1579 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!aplcen!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think!mintaka!bloom-beacon!eru!luth!sunic!dkuug!freja!ncjuul From: ncjuul@freja.diku.dk (Niels Christian Juul) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next,comp.sys.mac,comp.lang.smalltalk Subject: Re: A philosophic question Message-ID: <5046@freja.diku.dk> Date: 15 Dec 89 08:49:00 GMT References: <1634@xn.LL.MIT.EDU> <10754@claris.com> Organization: DIKU, U of Copenhagen, DK Lines: 21 In article <1634@xn.LL.MIT.EDU> rkc@XN.LL.MIT.EDU (rkc) writes: > 1: Why Xerox didn't make a killing. And peirce@claris.com (Michael Peirce) responded: >Read the book "Fumbling the future. How Xerox invented, then ignored, the >first personal computer", by Douglas K. Smith and Robert C. Alexander. >It's an excellent book that explains a lot of what was going on at Xerox >during the early PARC days. May I also drive Your attentions towards a short overview of the Xerox development history: "The Xerox Star: A Retrospective" by Jeff Johnson et al. in IEEE, Computer, september 1989, Vol22(9), p. 11-29 --Niels Christian Juul DIKU (aka Dept.Comp.Sci., Univ. of Copenhagen) Universitetsparken 1 DK 2100 Copenhagen DENMARK --ncjuul@diku.dk .