Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!aplcen!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ark1!nems!dtoa1!lumsdon
From: lumsdon@dtoa1.dt.navy.mil (Lumsdon)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: Procomm Plus, Version 1.1A
Message-ID: <570@nems.dt.navy.mil>
Date: 14 Dec 89 23:49:41 GMT
References: <13462@s.ms.uky.edu> <244@pallas.UUCP>
Sender: news@nems.dt.navy.mil
Reply-To: lumsdon@dtoa1.dt.navy.mil (Esther Lumsdon)
Organization: David Taylor Research Center, Bethesda, MD
Lines: 13

> problems with vi using vt100 and tvi 9xx ....

Yes, the vt102 emulation in Procomm Plus 1.1A is a step backwards
from that in Procomm 2.4.2.  I've run vttest (on a BSD machine) on Procomm
Pluss 1.1A, and Procomm 2.4.2 performed better.

Try falling back to 2.4.2, or perhaps you could define a termcap for
the ansi terminal in Plus?

---
Esther Lumsdon
David Taylor Research Center
Annapolis Lab  cm 301-267-3816   av 281-3816