Xref: utzoo rec.arts.startrek:34806 news.groups:15691
Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!uwvax!astroatc!vidiot!brown
From: brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek,news.groups
Subject: Re: moderated rec.arts.startrek offshoot
Message-ID: <320@vidiot.UUCP>
Date: 16 Dec 89 19:00:32 GMT
References: <1989Dec6.192838.26421@talos.uucp> <1701@mrsvr.UUCP> <299@vidiot.UUCP> <1989Dec14.162845.11079@talos.uu.net>
Reply-To: brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot)
Organization: Vidiot's Hangout
Lines: 24

In article <1989Dec14.162845.11079@talos.uu.net> kjones@talos.uu.net writes:
<Vidiot writes:
<
< > This is kind-of against the net rules, but even if someone else moderated
< > the group, I can still set up my system so that I can still post the guide,
< > schedules, etc.  I doubt that anyone would object.
<
<Hmmm, I didn't see anything against it in the newsgroup creation
<guidelines, although I'll admit that such a self-nomination could be
<interpreted as a powerplay.  In reality, I thought that I should be
<willing to back up my proposal with action.  Therefore I'm willing to
<moderate the group in lieu of any other volunteers.  As yet no
<volunteers have stepped forward.

Normally, when a person is a moderator, all information goes to that person
for posting/rejection.  In order to save money in shipping things to the
moderator, I was indicating that I would post directly to the net, the
schedules and the guides that I do.  What I post is expensive enough.  If
it is against the rules, I won't do it.
-- 
                harvard\     att!nicmad\
Vidiot            ucbvax!uwvax..........!astroatc!vidiot!brown
                rutgers/  decvax!nicmad/
        ARPA/INTERNET: <@spool.cs.wisc.edu,@astroatc:brown@vidiot>