Xref: utzoo rec.arts.startrek:34807 news.groups:15692 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!wuarchive!usc!ucsd!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!con.Berkeley.EDU!griffith From: griffith@con.Berkeley.EDU (Jim "The Big Dweeb" Griffith) Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek,news.groups Subject: A volunteer (was Re: moderated rec.arts.startrek offshoot) Message-ID: <20769@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> Date: 17 Dec 89 00:06:55 GMT References: <1989Dec6.192838.26421@talos.uucp> <1701@mrsvr.UUCP> <299@vidiot.UUCP> <1989Dec14.162845.11079@talos.uu.net> <320@vidiot.UUCP> Sender: news@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU Reply-To: griffith@con.Berkeley.EDU.UUCP (Jim "The Big Dweeb" Griffith) Organization: U.C. Berkeley Experimental Computing Facility Lines: 34 In article <320@vidiot.UUCP> brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot) writes: >In article <1989Dec14.162845.11079@talos.uu.net> kjones@talos.uu.net writes: >Normally, when a person is a moderator, all information goes to that person >for posting/rejection. In order to save money in shipping things to the >moderator, I was indicating that I would post directly to the net, the >schedules and the guides that I do. What I post is expensive enough. If >it is against the rules, I won't do it. Based on my experience with Vidiot's postings, I would say that if it can be worked out so that he can post his schedules, Paramount info, etc., straight to the newsgroup, it would be preferable to forcing him to route that stuff through a moderator. Is there a "joint moderatorship" scheme that would allow this? Jim ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jim Griffith /--OO--\ | ...!ucbvax!scam!griffith | "Take my Worf. Please" BEWARE BATS WITHOUT NOSES! |