Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!rpi!leah!ms361
From: ms361@leah.Albany.Edu (Mark Steinberger)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: Call for discussion: Amiga hardware group
Message-ID: <2338@leah.Albany.Edu>
Date: 20 Dec 89 04:27:11 GMT
References: <108.filbo@gorn.santa-cruz.ca.us> <1989Dec20.011102.595@ccu.umanitoba.ca>
Organization: The University at Albany, Computer Services Center
Lines: 18

In article <1989Dec20.011102.595@ccu.umanitoba.ca>, umcharl3@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Mike Charlton) writes:
> 
>   Personally, I don't think that having a new group addressing hardware
> on the amiga would affect me all that much since I would probably read
> both comp.sys.amiga and the proposed group.  However, I can't help
> thinking that a large number of people would also read both.  My
> question is: Would there be sufficient people who read one, but not the
> other to merit the creation of another group.

I don't know about other folks, but I'm not in the market for new
hardware, so the clutter of hardware questions really detracts from
my enjoyment of the group. I actually miss a lot because of the high
volume: I try to read the list of articles and decide what to read.

So for me it would be a great benefit to put the hardware in a different
group.

--Mark