Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!mcgill-vision!bloom-beacon!snorkelwacker!usc!henry.jpl.nasa.gov!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!peregrine!ccicpg!dave
From: dave@ccicpg.UUCP ( Dave Hill)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: late votes for *.AQUARIA
Summary: gong
Message-ID: <51814@ccicpg.UUCP>
Date: 19 Dec 89 22:50:22 GMT
References: <7327@ficc.uu.net> <63050@looking.on.ca> <7332@ficc.uu.net>
Organization: ccicpg
Lines: 21

In article <7332@ficc.uu.net>, peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) writes:
> 
> If he doesn't, I will. My poll was certainly no further from the letter of the
> guidleines than Richard's, and far closer to the spirit. It has established, as
> Richard's didn't, a group name that is widely accepted and appropriate.


All it really established was the fact that a large group of people
found your "poll":

		a). Uncalled for
		b). Useless
		c). A major whining fest by a major whiner
		d). Silly
		e). Wasn't it a "vote?"
		f). In very poor taste
		g). all of the above

and ignored it.

	Dave