Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!samsung!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!texbell!ficc!peter From: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: news.groups Subject: Re: Call for discussion: Amiga hardware group Message-ID: <7373@ficc.uu.net> Date: 20 Dec 89 15:19:46 GMT References: <108.filbo@gorn.santa-cruz.ca.us> <1989Dec20.011102.595@ccu.umanitoba.ca> Reply-To: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) Organization: Xenix Support, FICC Lines: 22 In article <1989Dec20.011102.595@ccu.umanitoba.ca> umcharl3@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Mike Charlton) writes: > Would there be sufficient people who read one, but not the > other to merit the creation of another group. Me. I've given up on comp.sys.amiga completely. Comp.sys.amiga.tech is about my speed, but even there there's a bunch of stuff I don't want to page through every day. Splitting out the hardware discussions (with my budget, they frustrate me more than anything else) would help. And then if I was looking for hardware info I'd know where to look. In fact it seems to me that a lot of the stuff that *is* crossposted between .amiga and .amiga.tech is hardware related... because people aren't sure which group it should go in, perhaps? PS: Don't run this article through \fBnroff\fR either. -- `-_-' Peter da Silva. +1 713 274 5180. . 'U` Also or . "It was just dumb luck that Unix managed to break through the Stupidity Barrier and become popular in spite of its inherent elegance." -- gavin@krypton.sgi.com