Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!texsun!texbell!vector!attctc!rissa
From: rissa@attctc.Dallas.TX.US (Patricia O Tuama)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: late votes for *.AQUARIA
Message-ID: <10708@attctc.Dallas.TX.US>
Date: 22 Dec 89 10:15:41 GMT
Organization: Lone Star Cafe
Lines: 12

In article <7395@ficc.uu.net> peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) writes:
>   I felt that extending
>that discussion period to 2 months was a little redundant.

So you're agreeing that if someone wishes to create a group by the
new da Silva process that a discussion period is not necessary.
Hey, that's great -- I commend you on your wisdom.  That will cut
down on at least some traffic in this newsgroup.

Just out of curiosity, Peter dear, what other existing guidelines
concerning the creation of new groups do you also feel may be bro-
ken in service to common sense?