Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!aplcen!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!purdue!bu-cs!mirror!frog!jp
From: jp@frog.UUCP (John Pimentel)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: call for discussion: rec.arts.startrek.info
Message-ID: <10810@frog.UUCP>
Date: 22 Dec 89 19:09:00 GMT
References: <8912121501.AA11524@talos.uu.net> <8912162235.AA13021@edison.CHO.GE.COM>
Reply-To: jp@frog.UUCP (John Pimentel)
Organization: Charles River Data Systems
Lines: 18

In article <8912162235.AA13021@edison.CHO.GE.COM> rja <rja@edison.cho.ge.com> writes:
>The proposal for r.a.si doesn't indicate the new group will
>be moderated.  If it isn't, the discussion in r.a.s will

YES IT DOES. "I propose a new moderated group".
C'mon people get with the program. 
And you guys call yourselves intelligent :-)

>
>The proposal needs to be rethought.

And so does your response ;-)

---
Take care and have a good day.	 	John.

STANDARD DISCLAIMER APPLIES.
UUCP: frog!jp