Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!mit-eddie!CLUTX.CLARKSON.EDU!woiccare@CLUTX.CLARKSON.EDU
From: woiccare@CLUTX.CLARKSON.EDU (The Inept Woj)
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Subject: Re: L&A video
Message-ID: <8912181814.AA04108@clutx.clarkson.edu>
Date: 18 Dec 89 18:14:56 GMT
Sender: daemon@eddie.mit.edu (Mr Background)
Organization: MIT
Lines: 25
Approved: nessus@eddie.mit.edu

pb1p+@ANDREW.CMU.EDU (Peter Glen Berger):
>I finally saw it last night.
 
> Hurrrmmmmmmmmmm.
 
> I wasn't terribly impressed.  Don't get me wrong, it wasn't
> *horrible*, but I really could have done without the ballet dancers.
> I thought they looked rather silly.
 
I have to agree and disagree -- the video is, oh, I don't know, dis-
appointing, I guess is a better way of putting it I think. I really 
expected something more substantial than a band video (which is all
it really it is in the long run). I didn't mind the dancers that much;
my problem is when the band kicks in -- it just loses any sense of
originality or neatness, or whatever it is I'm trying to say. Also,
what do you call that style of dancing that KaTe does? As Eric might
have a mentioned, for someone who took dancing lessons when younger,
it sure doesn't look it.


> I did like the glitter, though.
 
Ugh.

woj --- woiccare@clutx.clarkson.edu