Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think!mintaka!bloom-beacon!ora!daemon From: gcf@mydog.UUCP Newsgroups: soc.feminism Subject: Re: Montreal Message-ID: <202@ora.ora.com> Date: 16 Dec 89 14:54:18 GMT References: <5771@yunexus.UUCP> Sender: ambar@ora.ora.com Lines: 45 Approved: ambar@ora.com Beryl Logan (logan@nexus.yorku.ca): }I am concerned about something regarding the Montreal massacre and I }want to put it out for comments. Women in Thunder Bay, Ontario have }organized a vigil for the victims, to mourn them, and will bar men }from attending. ... }Violence against women is a societal problem, not men's problem or }women's problem. .... I don't think it is treating men with respect }if we say to them that we can't mourn alongside you. This is a }tragedy of society. But what is being grieved? Thunder Bay is a long way from Montreal, and it's more than likely that none of the women in Thunder Bay knew any of the victims of Montreal personally. Thousands of people, many of them young, are killed every day, and we don't experience grief, unless something makes them real for us. Sometimes it is media attention alone: sixty or so children are beaten to death every year in New York City, but only Lisa Steinberg was noticed. There have been plenty of mass killings in recent years. What distinguishes this one? I see two different distinctions: first, that it occurred in Canada, where these things aren't supposed to happen, and second, the overt motivation of the killer was misogyny. He said that women, or feminists, had "ruined his life." It is the second quality which makes the slaughter real for anyone who has experienced misogyny; and that experience is much more real for the object of it, than for an observer however sympathetic. What the women in Thunder Bay are grieving for is not something which happened to someone else far away but something which happened to them. Which is happening to them. When a person who experiences grief is in contact with one who doesn't, except vicariously, the former has to work at expressing her grief to the latter. The grief has to be packaged in language and gestures, all of which is a distraction from the work that the grief itself requires, which must be gone through. This, I think, is the explanation of why the women in Thunder Bay wanted to exclude men from their vigil, and I think it's a good reason. The vigil, for the women, was something different from whatever political and social action the persistence of misogyny calls for. The latter is certainly a common project; the former isn't. -- Gordon Fitch | gcf@mydog | uunet!hombre!mydog!gcf