Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!sun!sun-bb!khb From: khb@chiba.kbierman@sun.com (Keith Bierman - SPD Advanced Languages) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Integer Multiply/Divide on Sparc Message-ID: Date: 2 Jan 90 19:57:16 GMT References: <84768@linus.UUCP> <8840004@hpfcso.HP.COM> <84983@linus.UUCP> <135@altos86.Altos.COM> Sender: news@sun.Eng.Sun.COM Organization: Sun Microsystems Lines: 25 In-reply-to: dtynan@altos86.Altos.COM's message of 31 Dec 89 21:34:47 GMT In article <135@altos86.Altos.COM> dtynan@altos86.Altos.COM (Dermot Tynan) writes: ..... Wait a minute though. Doesn't SPICE use mostly floating-point for its simulations (I don't have a copy, so I don't know)?? If so, it's rather foolish to benchmark Integer M/D, with a floating-point package... I didn't chose the code, another poster did. As it happens, the circuit selected by the SPEC group causes SPICE to spend its time in a very different fashion than one usually expects (most of the commerical SPICEs have lavished great attention on fast solution of systems of equations (viz. linpack problem space stuff)) and that isn't true for this data set. Had it been true, the speed differential would be much more favorable for SPARC. -- Keith H. Bierman |*My thoughts are my own. !! kbierman@sun.com It's Not My Fault | MTS --Only my work belongs to Sun* I Voted for Bill & | Advanced Languages/Floating Point Group Opus | "When the going gets Weird .. the Weird turn PRO" "There is NO defense against the attack of the KILLER MICROS!" Eugene Brooks