Xref: utzoo gnu.gcc.bug:1784 comp.lang.c:24702
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!cica!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!rutgers!netnews.upenn.edu!eniac.seas.upenn.edu!weisen
From: weisen@eniac.seas.upenn.edu) (Neil I. Weisenfeld ;-)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.bug,comp.lang.c
Subject: switch() difficulties in gcc v1.35
Message-ID: <18472@netnews.upenn.edu>
Date: 23 Dec 89 05:46:22 GMT
Sender: news@netnews.upenn.edu
Reply-To: weisen@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (Neil I. Weisenfeld )
Organization: University of Pennsylvania
Lines: 24

It's been a while since this happened so I don't have the code lying
around, but....

I am using gcc v1.35 under DEC's ULTRIX.  I was diligently working on
a project that was due the next morning when quite a bit of my time
was taken up trying to find a really weird bug.  As it turns out, I
misspelled `default' as `defualt' in a switch statement.  The code
compiled without an error, however the `defualt' was never executed;
it just dropped out of the switch.  Is this a bug or is there a
rational `C' explanation for this?


Neil


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
   #              ##    Neil Weisenfeld        | Internet:
  ###               #   Univ. of Pennsylvania  | weisen@eniac.seas.upenn.edu
   #                 #  Computer Science Dept. | 
         #####       #  Class of 1991          | 
   #                 #                         | USPS:                    
  ###               #   <-giant killer         | 3700 Spruce St., Box 572 
   #              ##      net-smile            | Philadelphia, PA  19104  
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-