Xref: utzoo gnu.gcc.bug:1787 comp.lang.c:24716
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!snorkelwacker!bionet!rutgers!netnews.upenn.edu!eniac.seas.upenn.edu!weisen
From: weisen@eniac.seas.upenn.edu) (Neil I. Weisenfeld ;-)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.bug,comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: switch() difficulties in gcc v1.35
Message-ID: <18485@netnews.upenn.edu>
Date: 24 Dec 89 07:43:32 GMT
References: <18472@netnews.upenn.edu>
Sender: news@netnews.upenn.edu
Reply-To: weisen@eniac.seas.upenn.edu.UUCP (Neil I. Weisenfeld )
Organization: University of Pennsylvania
Lines: 17

Thanks to all those who gave me (non-obnoxious) replies to my posting.
I didn't realize that gcc would interpret `defualt' in a case xxx: as
a label if it hadn't been defined.  Is this non-ANSI C not to give an
error for undefined and un-prototyped symbols.

Neil


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
   #              ##    Neil Weisenfeld        | Internet:
  ###               #   Univ. of Pennsylvania  | weisen@eniac.seas.upenn.edu
   #                 #  Computer Science Dept. | 
         #####       #  Class of 1991          | 
   #                 #                         | USPS:                    
  ###               #   <-giant killer         | 3700 Spruce St., Box 572 
   #              ##      net-smile            | Philadelphia, PA  19104  
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-