Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think!linus!community-chest!mitchell
From: mitchell@community-chest.uucp (George Mitchell)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: Late Bloomers Revisited
Summary: Why not ALGOL?
Message-ID: <85180@linus.UUCP>
Date: 29 Dec 89 18:25:31 GMT
References: <1517@aber-cs.UUCP> <5455@bd.sei.cmu.edu> <18510@netnews.upenn.edu>
Sender: news@linus.UUCP
Reply-To: gmitchel@mitre.org (George Mitchell)
Organization: MITRE-McLean Software Engineering Laboratory
Lines: 9

In article <18510@netnews.upenn.edu> farber@linc.cis.upenn.edu (David Farber)
wrote:
>In hinesight it was the right path; PL/1 was not a easy
>language to compile for but there was NO other route.

Why not ALGOL?
/s/ George   vmail: 703/883-6029
email:  mitchell@community-chest.mitre.org    [alt: gmitchel@mitre.arpa]
snail:  GB Mitchell, MITRE, MS Z676, 7525 Colshire Dr, McLean, VA  22102