Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!samsung!cg-atla!bradlee From: bradlee@cg-atla.UUCP (Rob Bradlee) Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript Subject: Re: *COMPLETE* Postscript Description Message-ID: <8195@cg-atla.UUCP> Date: 26 Dec 89 13:41:49 GMT References: <28@macuni.mqcc.mq.oz> <619@cherry5.UUCP> <17490@rpp386.cactus.org> Reply-To: bradlee@cg-atla.UUCP (Rob Bradlee) Distribution: comp Organization: Agfa Compugraphic Division Lines: 18 In article <17490@rpp386.cactus.org> woody@rpp386.cactus.org (Woodrow Baker) writes: > >Actually, a Compiled version of PS is not unreasonable. Given a good >BNF of the language, YACC and LEX should make the parser a snap. > So, anybody got a BNF of PostScript? Any Language experts out there want to comment on or give pointers to articles on parsing PostScript? -- Rob Bradlee w:(508)-658-5600 X5153 h:(617)-944-5595 AGFA Compugraphic Division. ...!{decvax,samsung}!cg-atla!bradlee 200 Ballardvale St. Wilmington, Mass. 01887 The Nordic Way: Ski till it hurts!