Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!wuarchive!uunet!philmtl!philabs!linus!mbunix!ted
From: ted@mbunix.mitre.org (Ede)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript
Subject: Re: *COMPLETE* Postscript Description
Message-ID: <84919@linus.UUCP>
Date: 26 Dec 89 14:08:38 GMT
References: <POLLACK.89Dec4133944@toto.cis.ohio-state.edu> <28@macuni.mqcc.mq.oz> <1651@intercon.com> <17491@rpp386.cactus.org>
Sender: news@linus.UUCP
Reply-To: ted@mbunix.mitre.org (Ede)
Organization: The MITRE Corp. Bedford, MA
Lines: 17

In article <17491@rpp386.cactus.org> woody@rpp386.cactus.org (Woodrow Baker) writes:
> Secondarily, it sounds like NeWs (whatever that is)

So much for following what's going on in the PostScript world.

>might have the equivelent of the blit blitter, in copyarea.  I'd like to
>see the PS definition of the copyarea operator.
         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You mean the *non-portable* PostScript *extension*.  Printer/system
specific PostScript is a real drag.


|Ted Ede -- ted@mbunix.mitre.org -- The MITRE Corporation -- Burlington Road|
| linus!mbunix!ted -- Bedford MA, 01730 -- Mail Stop B090 -- (617) 271-7465 |
|                   - this line intentionally left blank -                  |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+