Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcrware!kim
From: kim@mcrware.UUCP (Kim Kempf)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os9
Subject: Re: OS9000/386
Message-ID: <1434@mcrware.UUCP>
Date: 22 Dec 89 16:43:58 GMT
References: <1989Dec18.085728.9745@metro.ucc.su.oz.au> <1805@ultb.isc.rit.edu> <1989Dec20.130322.896@ncsuvx.ncsu.edu> <1432@mcrware.UUCP> <8308@pogo.WV.TEK.COM>
Reply-To: kim@mcrware.UUCP (Kim Kempf)
Organization: Microware Systems Corp., Des Moines, Iowa
Lines: 20

In article <8308@pogo.WV.TEK.COM< jonh@pogo.WV.TEK.COM (Jon Howell) writes:
<<<     There is going to be a new computer coming out within six months at will
<<<run OS9000 thaat is built in to ROM.  This computer will run 6809 OS-9 stuff,
<<<                         cocoiii (John Vestal)
<<This of course, should have been cross posted to talk.rumors...
<<Kim Kempf, Microware Systems Corporation	{sun,uunet}!mcrware!kim
<Whoah!  Turn down the flame thrower, pal!  John was close.  The new computer
<should run Os9 68K (not OS9000.  BTW, what do the extra zeros do for it?)
<in addition to everything John mentioned.  (tho there is debate as to whether
<Kim, being a uW employee doesn't MAKE you an authority, much less give you
<the right to shame people's postings.  Please research the subject a bit

I forgot the appropriate "personal opinion" disclaimer when I posted.  I just
felt my net reader obligation to respond to questionable accuracy of 
information: "OS9000 thaat is built in to ROM."  I had no personal attack in
my posting as yours did, and I'm sure the readers appreciate your vigilance.
-- 
----------------
Kim Kempf, Microware Systems Corporation	{sun,uunet}!mcrware!kim
           My employer guffaws at my opinions....