Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!aries!mcdonald
From: mcdonald@aries.scs.uiuc.edu (Doug McDonald)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.d
Subject: Re: popi, the digital darkroom
Message-ID: <1989Dec29.150055.15892@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: 29 Dec 89 15:00:55 GMT
References: <1989Dec27.053537.14990@eng.umd.edu> <2567@cunixc.cc.columbia.edu>
Sender: news@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (News)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Chemical Sciences
Lines: 24

In article <2567@cunixc.cc.columbia.edu> shenkin@cunixc.cc.columbia.edu (Peter S. Shenkin) writes:
>In article <1989Dec27.053537.14990@eng.umd.edu> linco@eng.umd.edu (Sam Lin) writes:
>>
>>
>>What is popi, the digital darkroom?  Where can I get documentation on
>>it?  I have looked thru all of the articles, and I can't find a description
>
>I had the same question.  WHAT THE F*** IS IT?  Why can't people put
>a ten-line description of "what the f*** it is" in front of source postings?
>(No, the name DOESN'T say it!)
>
>For moderated newsgroups, would it not be appropriate for the moderator
>to encourage or ensure or supply this?
>
I agree 1000%!!! The following is in TeX:
{\Huge \bf  

What good is a moderator if he can't even insure that a proper desciption
accompanies the files he sends out. 

} 
Yes, this is a flame.

Doug McDonald