Xref: utzoo news.groups:16006 comp.sys.amiga:46543 comp.sys.amiga.tech:9029
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!texsun!texbell!splut!jay
From: jay@splut.conmicro.com (Jay "you ignorant splut!" Maynard)
Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.sys.amiga,comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: Splitting Up Comp.Sys.Amiga--An old idea
Summary: The original message in this thread is a forgery.
Message-ID: <8853-@splut.conmicro.com>
Date: 30 Dec 89 13:30:24 GMT
References: <959@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca>
Reply-To: jay@splut.conmicro.com (Jay "you ignorant splut!" Maynard)
Organization: Confederate Microsystems, League City, TX
Lines: 24

In <&_F+L.@splut.conmicro.com>, jay@splut.conmicro.com (Jay "you
ignorant splut!" Maynard) DID NOT WRITE:
>Having just read in todays paper that Commodore has decided to
>drop the Amiga from its product line up, isn't it about time to
>create comp.sys.orphans for it and various other computing flivvers ?
>
>At the same time we can, I think, safely remove comp.sys.amiga
>and .tech.

The message included above is a forgery.

I have absolutely no interest whatsoever in the Amiga line of computers,
and could care less about the Amiga groups.

I know of no such newspaper article. If I had seen one, I would have
cited newspaper, date, and page.

Please ignore that forged message.

-- 
Jay Maynard, EMT-P, K5ZC, PP-ASEL   | Never ascribe to malice that which can
jay@splut.conmicro.com       (eieio)| adequately be explained by stupidity.
{attctc,bellcore}!texbell!splut!jay +----------------------------------------
     Here come Democrats...here come Democrats...throwing money a-way...