Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!ames!pacbell!sactoh0!mfolivo
From: mfolivo@sactoh0.UUCP (Mark F. Newton)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: Unexpandable megas
Summary: Oh please, spare us.
	 (Another whiner)
Message-ID: <2334@sactoh0.UUCP>
Date: 26 Dec 89 08:45:40 GMT
References: <8912120805.AA00886@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> <370009@acf5.NYU.EDU> <25353@cup.portal.com>
Organization: Sacramento Public Access, Ca. USA
Lines: 27


Gee whiz...

All this bashing (will it ever end? Do they have this on
c.s.amiga??)

Let's see, business can change a design anytime they want, due to a
number of reasons, like perhaps a better design, less expensive to
make, etc. So what if Atari uses two separate board designs? Who
care? Why waste our time (and money) crying about the little
things?

SIMMs? Maybe again, Atari has gotten better pricing on memory chips
with SIMMS rather than DRAMS. 

**WHO CARES???** Why are you crying about why someone uses a
particular type of memory chip? Does it *really, really* matter
that my 4 Megabytes are DRAMS, and an STE uses 1Mb in SIMMs???

Sore ja da-cha,
Shinobu

-- 
Sakura-mento, CA
 
mmsac!sactoh0!mfolivo   mfolivo@sactoh0
pacbell!sactoh0!mfolivo   (they're worth a try...)