Xref: utzoo comp.sys.ibm.pc:40702 comp.unix.xenix:9187 comp.unix.i386:1972 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!snorkelwacker!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!texbell!vector!attctc!cassidy From: cassidy@attctc.Dallas.TX.US (Cassidy Lynar) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.unix.xenix,comp.unix.i386 Subject: Re: ISC update Keywords: ISC Message-ID: <10732@attctc.Dallas.TX.US> Date: 24 Dec 89 20:33:56 GMT References: <511090@nstar.UUCP> Reply-To: cassidy@attctc.Dallas.TX.US (Cassidy Lynar) Followup-To: comp.sys.ibm.pc Organization: The Unix(R) Connection BBS, Dallas, Tx Lines: 65 In article <511090@nstar.UUCP> larry@nstar.UUCP (Larry Snyder) writes: > >Excellent support, indeed. I did learn of the X7 update coming out that >updates the mailer (sendmail). If you want a REAL mailer, get a copy of smail3, as ISC's mailers are hosed and half-baked... I switched to smail3 about 3 months ago, and all is well... >I've been told that nn is an excellent threaded news reader. Does it run >well under X? I'm in the process of installing nn right now. Works just dandy over here... make sure you do have the lastest of patches tho, as I had problems with anything under patch 6, in which the daemon was from time to time crashing. NN also uses a large amount of disk space to build it's tables. >Next project - order X-Windows. Bryan @ ISC mentioned that the next release >of X (due in a couple of weeks) will support my ATI VGA Wonder board in the Humph! Why spend 800.00 on X11 when you can get the sources and build it yourself? ISC has a wonderful ability to take free sources, hack and screw it up, then turn around and charge you a great deal of money for it. >Futher reading about X brings forth that fact that I *really* should have a >math co-processor to run X - now what would you get - 4 more megs of ram >(making 8 total) or a math co-processor (the 80387 would only be use with X)? Personally, I would go for 4 more megs of ram. >I consider the serial IO throughput the major problem with ISC - but feel >that it can be handled - but still haven't found how. Multiple 2400 baud Alas, ISC *still* has yet to fix the bugs in the asy driver. My TB averages 600 - 800 *tops* using during transfers. I have the X5 update in use but it was only a minor help. One of these days, ISC *may* figure out how to build a driver that works :) >- maybe I should install ELM under ix? I wonder how ELM runs under X? Elm 2.2 is what I am running, and its great under X11. >test. I might need to sell my SCO if I need both the memory and the co- >processor (how does $325 sound for 2.3.2 (with 2.3.3 update) of the '386 >release (5 months old)? Hehe, anybody want to buy a 25 Mhz 386 w/4 megs ram and the full ISC 2.0.2 package? (Unlimited run-time, X11, TCP/IP, SD, 10 Plus crap, the list goes on...) I am getting a *real* os, (Sun 3/80 w/SunOS 4.0.3) I have had it with the poor service and lousey track record of ISC. Bryan? You reading this? Where the hell are my floppies? Its been 3 weeks now... sheesh! >Regards to all, and the best of the Holiday Season to you and your family. Same to you, and everyone else.. Have a Merry Christmas. -cassidy ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Cassidy Lynar CyberSpace TechnoWizards Consortium, Inc Irving, Texas Inet: texbell!walstib!sysop@cs.utexas.edu UUCP: sysop@walstib.lonestar.org ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~