Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol!emory!hubcap!ncrcae!ncr-sd!serene!rfarris
From: rfarris@serene.UUCP (Rick Farris)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: ISC update
Keywords: ISC
Message-ID: <1264@serene.UUCP>
Date: 29 Dec 89 09:38:46 GMT
References: <511090@nstar.UUCP> <10732@attctc.Dallas.TX.US> <1989Dec29.033057.10673@jdyx.UUCP>
Reply-To: rfarris@serene.UU.NET (Rick Farris)
Organization: Serenity BBS, Del Mar, California
Lines: 14

In article <1989Dec29.033057.10673@jdyx.UUCP> tpf@jdyx.UUCP (Tom Friedel) writes: 

> our companies 386/Unix graphics package started as an X port that was
> > 1/2 way done in < 1 man year.  

Well, to start off with, you're comparing apples and oranges, but
even if it was a good comparison, you've implied that the second
"half" of your port would take no longer than the first "half."  

I hope you don't believe that.


Rick Farris   RF Engineering  POB M  Del Mar, CA  92014   voice (619) 259-6793
rfarris@serene.uu.net      ...!uunet!serene!rfarris       serene.UUCP 259-7757