Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol!cica!iuvax!ndcheg!ndmath!nstar!thelink!delta!don
From: don@delta.uucp (Donald K. Irmiger)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: XMODEM,YMODEM,ZMODEM,KERMIT Which is best and why?
Keywords: ZMODEM
Message-ID: <1989Dec31.210253.25273@delta.uucp>
Date: 31 Dec 89 21:02:53 GMT
References: <32428@news.Think.COM>
Reply-To: don@delta.UUCP (Donald K. Irmiger)
Organization: Michiana Rehabilitation Institute, South Bend, IN
Lines: 14

In article <32428@news.Think.COM> saroff@.tmc.edu (steven saroff) writes:
>I am interested in learning about the various flavors of transfer
>programs for PC's etc.

I've always had an affinity for ZMODEM.  I'm using ProComm Plus (which does
not directly support ZMODEM) doing file transfers to/from a Xenix box.
Works great.  I like the ability to resurrect an interrupted transfer,
although I've yet to use it.

Cheap too.

Donald K. Irmiger III                                  UUCP: uunet!delta!don
Data Systems Coordinator                               Altos 2086/Xenix 3.4b
Michiana Rehabilitation Institute's Data Systems Center