Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!ndcheg!ndmath!nstar!larry
From: larry@nstar.UUCP (Larry Snyder)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: XMODEM,YMODEM,ZMODEM,KERMIT Which is best and why?
Summary: Xenix transfers
Keywords: ZMODEM
Message-ID: <511115@nstar.UUCP>
Date: 1 Jan 90 23:05:43 GMT
References: <32428@news.Think.COM> <1989Dec31.210253.25273@delta.uucp>
Organization: Northern Star Communications, Notre Dame, IN, USA
Lines: 15

In article <1989Dec31.210253.25273@delta.uucp>, don@delta.uucp (Donald K. Irmiger) writes:
> 
> I've always had an affinity for ZMODEM.  I'm using ProComm Plus (which does
> not directly support ZMODEM) doing file transfers to/from a Xenix box.
> Works great.  I like the ability to resurrect an interrupted transfer,
> although I've yet to use it.

I am running ProYam here on nstar and it supports all the protocols 
available in the most popular DOS packages but best of all, ProYam
is available for Unix System V and Xenix.   ProYam is $139 (retail).

-- 
          Larry Snyder, Northern Star Communications, Notre Dame, IN USA 
                uucp: larry@nstar -or- ...!iuvax!ndmath!nstar!larry
                         "Don't waste your time with QNX!"