Xref: utzoo comp.sys.ibm.pc:41006 comp.unix.xenix:9279 comp.unix.i386:2096
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!uunet!visdc!jiii
From: jiii@visdc.UUCP (John E Van Deusen III)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.unix.xenix,comp.unix.i386
Subject: Re: ISC update
Summary: smail3
Keywords: ISC
Message-ID: <725@visdc.UUCP>
Date: 1 Jan 90 20:49:17 GMT
References: <511090@nstar.UUCP> <1989Dec20.184947.3562@ddsw1.MCS.COM>
Reply-To: jiii@visdc.UUCP (John E Van Deusen III)
Organization: VI Software Development, Boise, Idaho
Lines: 15

In article <1989Dec20.184947.3562@ddsw1.MCS.COM> karl@mcs.MCS.COM
(Karl Denninger) writes:
>
> ...Throw it [sendmail] out and run smail 3.  We did that, and ...
> it really >is< a drop-in sendmail replacement, including the TCP/IP
> connections!

I pulled smail3 from the UUNET archives,
uunet~/ftp/comp.sources.unix/volume11/smail3/part0[123].Z, and it's not
smail 3 at all; it's smail 2.5.  If smail2.5 is called smail3, what is
smail 3 called?  Have I entered the Twilight Zone?
--
John E Van Deusen III, PO Box 9283, Boise, ID  83707, (208) 343-1865

uunet!visdc!jiii