Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!agate!brahms.berkeley.edu!silverio From: silverio@brahms.berkeley.edu (C J Silverio) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer Subject: Re: licensing agreements Message-ID: <1989Dec27.180649.16935@agate.berkeley.edu> Date: 27 Dec 89 18:06:49 GMT References: <14956@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU> <9338@hoptoad.uucp> <9430@spool.cs.wisc.edu> <1989Dec26.212420.19786@dvinci.usask.ca> Sender: usenet@agate.berkeley.edu (USENET Administrator;;;;ZU44) Reply-To: silverio@brahms.berkeley.edu.UUCP (C J Silverio) Organization: Bath Department, UC Merkeley Lines: 26 Irving Reid likes Think C's license: Check out the "limited warranty" on Think C 4.0. In an age where most software is sold "as is", they warrant that their software will operate "substantially as documented", and promise to correct either the software or documentation or give you your money back if it doesn't. I've been suffering through a contract lately using a 4GL that's buggy as hell, so I'm pretty sensitive about this sort of stuff. Congratulations to Symantec for actually caring enough about software quality to guarantee that their stuff really works. I am not a lawyer, nor do I play one on the net, but I once used the "warrantee of implied merchantability" -- that a given product will perform "substantially as advertised/documented" -- to get my money back for a database program that, well, substantially DIDN'T. The point is that all those warranties that say, basically, "by using our product, you agree that you have no warrantees or legal recourse whatsoever" are just plain LYING. Many states in the US enforce certain warrantees no matter what the license says. No amount of capital letters, bold, italic, mumbo-jumbo about "sealed packages", etc, can change that. This is what that incantation about "your rights may vary from state to state" means. It also means that a consumer practically must hire a lawyer to figure out what rights s/he has. Not that the lawyer can help, since the products usually are too inexpensive to fight about in court, and recently judges have been quavering back and forth about what the laws actually mean ANYWAY.