Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!intercon!news
From: amanda@mermaid.intercon.com (Amanda Walker)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: Handles and Virtual Memory
Message-ID: <1675@intercon.com>
Date: 3 Jan 90 16:13:25 GMT
References: <9415@hoptoad.uucp> <18300010@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> <18054@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU> <9438@hoptoad.uucp> <1669@intercon.com> <33448@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>
Sender: news@intercon.com
Reply-To: amanda@mermaid.intercon.com (Amanda Walker)
Lines: 14

In article <33448@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>, oster@dewey.soe.berkeley.edu (David
Phillip Oster) writes:
> (The above assumes you have a virtual memory system, and a decent
> implementation of malloc(), so you don't have to worry about fragmentation
> of the heap.)

Well, until recently, I haven't been willing to assume the latter, especially
on things like PC's (bleah :-)).  Under UNIX it works pretty well.  OK,
now that David has done the Memory Manager, who wants to do the Resource
Manager :-)?

Amanda Walker
InterCon Systems Corporation
--