Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!apple!sun-barr!rutgers!att!chinet!randy
From: randy@chinet.chi.il.us (Randy Suess)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: which/type & built-ins
Message-ID: <1990Jan3.191259.22586@chinet.chi.il.us>
Date: 3 Jan 90 19:12:59 GMT
References: <1297@quintus.UUCP> <1990Jan2.160927.11935@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> <1301@quintus.UUCP>
Reply-To: randy@chinet.chi.il.us (Randy Suess)
Organization: Chinet - Chicago Public Access UNIX
Lines: 19

In article <1301@quintus.UUCP> ok@quintus.UUCP (Richard A. O'Keefe) writes:
>
>Yes, I *KNOW* that.  That's an excellent argument for having "type while"
>say "while is a keyword" rather than "while is a shell builtin".
>It is *NOT* an argument for having "type while" say "while not found".

	(From within vi)
	r!type while
while is a keyword
	r!type for

for is a keyword

	This is with ksh version 88b on i386.

	-randy
-- 
Randy Suess
randy@chinet.chi.il.us