Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!lll-winken!uwm.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!rutgers!columbia!cs!beshers From: beshers@cs.cs.columbia.edu (Clifford Beshers) Newsgroups: comp.windows.x Subject: Re: Newsgroup Split Message-ID: Date: 22 Dec 89 20:23:03 GMT References: <622@codonics.COM> <8912221426.AA14382@expire.lcs.mit.edu> Sender: beshers@cs.columbia.edu Organization: Columbia University Computer Science Lines: 12 In-reply-to: rws@EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU's message of 22 Dec 89 14:26:17 GMT In article <8912221426.AA14382@expire.lcs.mit.edu> rws@EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU (Bob Scheifler) writes: I could conceivably be convinced to split xpert into two lists, but I really doubt you can get agreement on what the two lists should be. How about a list for those who want two lists, and another for those who don't? -- ----------------------------------------------- Cliff Beshers Columbia University Computer Science Department beshers@cs.columbia.edu