Path: utzoo!attcan!telly!robohack!woods From: woods@robohack.UUCP (Greg A. Woods) Newsgroups: news.config Subject: Re: Unregistered-but-referenced sites (was Re: deleted UUCP sites) Summary: blow them away, or at least mark them dead Keywords: uucp maps site Message-ID: <1990Jan5.012105.22132@robohack.UUCP> Date: 5 Jan 90 01:21:05 GMT References: <4195@convex.UUCP> <30273@mcdchg.chg.mcd.mot.com> <43496@improper.coherent.com> <1990Jan3.164811.5457@ddsw1.MCS.COM> <599@unmvax.unm.edu> Distribution: news Organization: R. H. Lathwell Associates: Elegant Communications, Inc. Lines: 30 In article <599@unmvax.unm.edu> lee@unmvax.cs.unm.edu (Lee Ward) writes: > In article <1990Jan3.164811.5457@ddsw1.MCS.COM> karl@mcs.MCS.COM (Karl Denninger) writes: > >In article <43496@improper.coherent.com> dplatt@coherent.com (Dave Platt) writes: > >>In article <30273@mcdchg.chg.mcd.mot.com> heiby@chg.mcd.mot.com (Ron Heiby) writes: > >>So... consider what happens if some new site comes on line, and chooses > >>a name for itself... say, "ilmss". That name isn't reserved, it's up > >>for grabs, and they take it. They publish a map-file, reserving this > >>name for themselves. > > > >The new "ilmss", however, can't tell that their choice of name is ALREADY > >TAKEN, since you would have mcdchg delete the declaration from their map > >entry! Ah, but "ilmss" *isn't* allready taken. The name is only reserved if there is a complete map entry for the site. > If someone wants to route through unmvax to a private link that is > unregistered (there are some). They use: > > private!name@unmvax However, if the private link is mentioned, but not registered, it is liable to end up getting lots of mail for the real "private". The only correct thing to do to entries mentioning private links is to either delete them, or mark them dead. They should NOT be there. -- Greg A. Woods woods@{robohack,gate,tmsoft,ontmoh,utgpu,gpu.utcs.Toronto.EDU,utorgpu.BITNET} +1 416 443-1734 [h] +1 416 595-5425 [w] VE3-TCP Toronto, Ontario; CANADA