Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!texbell!ficc!peter From: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: news.groups Subject: Re: late votes for *.AQUARIA Message-ID: <7412@ficc.uu.net> Date: 24 Dec 89 15:43:58 GMT References: <10729@attctc.Dallas.TX.US> Reply-To: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) Organization: Xenix Support, FICC Lines: 19 > So you're saying that if someone wishes to create a group by the > new da Silva process that a discussion period -is- necessary? Yes, maam. There ain't no "da Silva process". > >Any of 'em. Just be sure that common sense is what you're operating on, > Why? You didn't. Well, ah guess we'll hafta agree to disagree on that, maam. It's mah considerd 'pinion that ah call for discussion is jest a mite less important than agreement on th' name. -- `-_-' Peter da Silva. +1 713 274 5180. . 'U` Also or . "It was just dumb luck that Unix managed to break through the Stupidity Barrier and become popular in spite of its inherent elegance." -- gavin@krypton.sgi.com