Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!mit-eddie!bbn!bbn.com!rshapiro From: rshapiro@bbn.com (Richard Shapiro) Newsgroups: news.groups Subject: Re: Pink Floyd Voting Message-ID: <50079@bbn.COM> Date: 25 Dec 89 15:55:31 GMT References: <1989Dec20.170438.11492@aqdata.uucp> <574@enea.se> Sender: news@bbn.COM Reply-To: rshapiro@BBN.COM (Richard Shapiro) Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., Cambridge MA Lines: 21 In article TAR@MAINE.BITNET (Thom Rounds) writes: >In article <574@enea.se>, sommar@enea.se (Erland Sommarskog) says: >>I haven't even seen a call for discussion in the right place. > > I posted the Call for Discussion for rec.music.pfloyd in news.group AND >news.accounce.newgroups, not to mention alt.rock-n-roll and rec.music.misc. >If you didn't see it, you weren't paying attention. Assuming you mean "news.announce.newgroups" and "news.groups", I didn't see any call for discussion there either (and I pay very close attention to the former, at least). I don't read alt.rock-n-roll anymore and I only skim through r.m.misc, so it certainly could have appeared on one of those two. Of course if you posted to the groups precisely as you spelled them, that would explain the problem (and also justify Erland's point that the call for discussion went to the wrong places). To simplify matters, I suggest you simply repost the call for discussion.