Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!pdn!gumby!dixon
From: dixon@gumby.paradyne.com (Tom Dixon(813-530-8358))
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION ' comp.sys.netware'
Keywords: novell, netware, protocols, lan
Message-ID: <6855@pdn.paradyne.com>
Date: 26 Dec 89 22:31:50 GMT
References: <914@excelan.COM>
Sender: usenet@pdn.paradyne.com
Reply-To: dixon@gumby.paradyne.com (Tom Dixon)
Organization: AT&T Paradyne, Largo, Florida
Lines: 32

In article <914@excelan.COM> manoj@excelan.COM (manoj @ Prod Mktg) writes:
>                        CALL FOR DISCUSSION
>			comp.sys.netware

My 28 cents worth....

1. novell instead of netware.  As someone else said, it's not comp.sys.SunOS.

2. I also would prefer it if this was not a sys group.  The sys groups are
   beginning to streched way out of proportion.  But novell is not specific 
   to any one hardware platform, protocol or OS.  It is an Network Operating 
   System.
  
   So if we can either set it up as something catchy, like:
	comp.netos.novell

   Or we can lump it in the sys group.


So my prefencences....

1. comp.netos.novell
2. comp.sys.novell
3. comp.*.netware

But all in all, I'd say it's an idea whose time has come.


---------
Tom Dixon					dixon@pdn.paradyne.com
AT&T Paradyne, Largo, Fla			uunet!pdn!dixon
(813)530-8358