Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!aplcen!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!texbell!vector!attctc!rissa
From: rissa@attctc.Dallas.TX.US (Patricia O Tuama)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: late votes for *.AQUARIA
Message-ID: <10748@attctc.Dallas.TX.US>
Date: 27 Dec 89 07:42:00 GMT
References: <10729@attctc.Dallas.TX.US> <7412@ficc.uu.net>
Organization: Lone Star Cafe
Lines: 18

In article <7412@ficc.uu.net> peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) writes:
>> So you're saying that if someone wishes to create a group by the 
>> new da Silva process that a discussion period -is- necessary?
>Yes, maam.

Good, we really are making progress now.

>There ain't no "da Silva process".

Well, whatever we're calling it, I referred to it as the da Silva 
process since you were the first person to use it.

>Well, ah guess we'll hafta agree to disagree on that, maam. It's mah
>considerd 'pinion that ah call for discussion is jest a mite less important
>than agreement on th' name.

Fine with me, clearly you don't think either one is worth a hill of
beans so it hardly matters which one you think is more important.