Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!mit-eddie!attctc!rissa
From: rissa@attctc.Dallas.TX.US (Patricia O Tuama)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: Call for discussion re: rec.antique-radio
Message-ID: <10761@attctc.Dallas.TX.US>
Date: 28 Dec 89 08:55:47 GMT
Organization: Lone Star Cafe
Lines: 20

In article <-#DC7-@rpi.edu> tale@cs.rpi.edu (David C Lawrence) writes:
>In article <1078@swbatl.UUCP> adams@swbatl.UUCP (4237) writes:
>> Hence I propose rec.antique-radio for the discussion of early radio
>> news, hints and discussion.
>I suspect that there is not enough traffic on this topic to justify
>purusing a newsgroup for it, but if it is indeed brought to vote I
>think that a better place for it would be in the newly formed
>rec.radio hierarchy as rec.radio.antique.  


Or alternatively, 4237 could simply follow the new da Silva voting
process and call for a vote today for talk.antique-radio or perhaps
misc.antique-radio since it fulfills Chuq's requirement that the 
group be complimentary but not overlapping.  

Just make sure you call it an "opinion poll" on a newsgroup name and 
not an actual vote, otherwise you'll violate Peter's guidelines to
say nothing of his common sense.

Hope this helps.