Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!decwrl!megatest!djones
From: djones@megatest.UUCP (Dave Jones)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Re: Call For Votes: REC.AUDIO.HIGH-END
Message-ID: <11644@goofy.megatest.UUCP>
Date: 29 Dec 89 02:36:18 GMT
References: <1656@uwm.edu>
Organization: Megatest Corporation, San Jose, Ca
Lines: 11

I voted against the proposal. As usual, I oppose moderated groups
except in purely technical areas. Discussions as to the subjective
merits of various commercial audio products is not in this category.
I mentioned that I might vote for a moderated sci.accoustics, or
sci.amp-circuitry.

Am I reading something into this that I shouldn't? It seems as though just
about every call for a moderated group lately has been a call to duplicate
some talk or rec group, but to keep out those who would suggest that the
Emperor's clothes were less than sufficient for the winter season. Is it
my imagination, or is this more of the same?