Xref: utzoo news.groups:16045 comp.sys.amiga:46621
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!usc!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!husc6!bu.edu!bu-cs!buengc!bph
From: bph@buengc.BU.EDU (Blair P. Houghton)
Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: comp.sys.amiga.questions
Message-ID: <5174@buengc.BU.EDU>
Date: 1 Jan 90 21:35:15 GMT
References: <7049@nigel.udel.EDU> <57b.02t179Uh01@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com> <123.filbo@gorn.santa-cruz.ca.us> <25508@cup.portal.com> <ATWASBny2@ficc.uu.net>
Reply-To: bph@buengc.bu.edu (Blair P. Houghton)
Followup-To: news.groups
Organization: Boston Univ. Col. of Eng.
Lines: 14

In article <ATWASBny2@ficc.uu.net> peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) writes:
>Out here in the real world a 2400 baud connection is the best you can depend
>on for non-UNIX non-industry groups like comp.pc.*. I don't even get it here
>at Ferranti, and I'm the news admin.

Make that 1200 baud, Pete.  You're on the beam, tho'.  Noone can
reasonably expect all of the net to read at the speed of
their microwave links.

				--Blair
				  "But it's got this little
				   switch that will let it
				   run at 300 baud if the net
				   gets really crowded..."