Xref: utzoo news.groups:16082 rec.arts.movies:28017 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!mailrus!bbn!bbn.com!rshapiro From: rshapiro@bbn.com (Richard Shapiro) Newsgroups: news.groups,rec.arts.movies Subject: renewed Call for Discussion: rec.arts.cinema Keywords: the preferred name Message-ID: <50326@bbn.COM> Date: 3 Jan 90 15:20:12 GMT Sender: news@bbn.COM Lines: 44 Several people have expressed approval for "rec.arts.cinema" as the name of the proposed "serious movie talk" group, and no one has expressed serious disapproval. Unless there are strong objections to this name, I suggest we go with it. Likewise, everyone who's expressed a positive opinion about the group and who's expressed some opinion about whether or not it should be moderated has come down in favor of moderation. If anyone is in favor of the group, but opposed to it being moderated, now's the time to speak up. Otherwise, we should consider that matter settled as well. Finally, we have one volunteer for moderator so far (Manavendra Thakur). If anyone else wants to volunteer or is unhappy in any way about Mr Thakur's qualifications, please speak up. A charter might look something like the following. PLEASE feel free to amend this in any way that seems appropriate -- it's just a starting suggestion. REC.ARTS.CINEMA A moderated group for the serious discussion of movies. Any movie, regardless of its artistic stature, is fair game for discussion, as is any substantive approach to the subject. Explicitly *excluded* from this group are the following: Any kind of trivia questions/answers/games: use r.a.m instead Simple lists (eg, movies made by director X): use r.a.m instead Simple factual queries (eg "Who starred in x"): use r.a.m instead Movie reviews (as opposed to analysis): use r.a.m.reviews instead Queries/Reports of video availability: use r.v.software if it passes Flames: count to 10 instead Moderator: Manavendra Thakur [note to Evelyn Leeper: please re-post this to r.a.m.reviews if you think it's appropriate]